Problem 5 of 5 · Cost
Unit price misses the costs of inspection, rework, delays and field failures.
From the problem to a production plan
Phoenix reviews what the application actually uses and what the complete assembly requires. The printing project combined the display, PCB, controls and connectors; the point-of-sale project reported savings alongside a shorter supply cycle. Neither result is a promise for another program.
Industrial printing
Phoenix combined a backlit graphic display with a custom PCB, push buttons and connectors, using existing components as building blocks.
The published story reports minimized tooling, multiple assembly variants, domestic stocking programs and worldwide logistics supporting the customer's manufacturing strategy.
Read the full client storyPoint of sale
Phoenix developed the replacement and procured longer-lead components against projected volumes.
The published project reports a 6-week lead time and an 18% cost reduction. The relationship expanded to nine LCD modules. These are historical project results, not current pricing or delivery commitments.
Read the full client storyThe root causes we see most often behind cost issues.
The sequence from Keith Mitnik's Why Change? framework for a cost problem.
Count total cost — inspection, rework, delays and field failures — not unit price
Right-size the spec to how the display is really used
Treat cost as the last reason to change suppliers, never the first
Review the spec before accepting any annual price increase
Unit price is the easiest number to compare across display quotes, and the easiest one to be misled by. A lower quoted price that does not account for prevention activities, inspection rigor, or the likelihood of field failures can end up costing more once rework, warranty claims, and schedule disruption are factored in.
Cost of quality frameworks separate prevention costs — incurred to avoid problems before they occur, such as establishing material specifications — from appraisal costs, the ongoing measuring and monitoring work needed to confirm a product actually conforms to spec.
A quoted unit price that excludes meaningful investment in either category is not necessarily cheaper; it may simply be deferring the cost to a later stage of the program, where it resurfaces as scrap, rework, or returns.
Supply chain cost problems rarely show up as a single line item; they tend to surface alongside the other core issues that affect sourced components more broadly — obsolescence, delivery, and quality among them — rather than in isolation.
Framing a sourcing decision around a narrow unit-cost savings target, without weighing those connected risks, tends to produce decisions that look favorable in a spreadsheet but create downstream problems in production or in the field.
A total-cost evaluation weighs prevention and appraisal investment, documented quality history, delivery reliability, and obsolescence exposure alongside unit price — not instead of it. That view is harder to build than a simple quote comparison, but it is the one that holds up once a product is in volume production.
Phoenix Display works with purchasing and engineering teams to build that fuller cost picture during sourcing, rather than leaving total cost to be discovered after the fact.
Unit price often excludes prevention and appraisal investment and says nothing about failure history, obsolescence exposure, or delivery reliability — all of which affect total program cost.
Cost should be evaluated alongside obsolescence, delivery, and quality risk together, since a decision optimized for cost alone frequently creates exposure in one of the other areas.
Answer them and we'll connect you with a sales engineer. Reply within 24 hours.
Question 1 of 5
Keep learning · Obsolescence
A total-cost review should include the cost of an unexpected replacement. Revisit lifecycle and obsolescence planning before committing.
Learn about obsolescenceReady to discuss your program?
Share your display, application and production schedule with Phoenix's engineering team.
Contact usPlanning a new product? Review fit, interface, readability and lifecycle before the design is locked.
Plan your display design